Dis-organising Resolution

The "Organizing Resolution", a relatively simple piece of legal documentation that allows the Imperial Parliament to start work. It requires the Speaker to declare who the leader of the majority is, who the leader of the minority is and also who the speaker for the next session is to be.

Despite the relative simplicity this process, the parliament is currently making a rather large meal out of the process. Instead of pro-activity, typical ACP-AAP niggling has taken over. At a time when the Empire really needs the Parliament to step up to the plate and be active in the real Parliamentary sense of the word, that is getting things done, they choose to stall over who should be the speaker.

Pete James (AAP) has but himself forward, a refreshing change perhaps following what seems like the interminable stewardship of Matthieu Poiters (ACP)? Apparently not. James has been accused of being a dictator by Jose Frias (ACP):

in the times that he has been speaker, he has treated the speakership as a dictatorship, threatening to throw out bills left and right, especially targeted were conservative bills.

James responded by declaring that he had always been fair and impartial. Adding to this he stated that:

The Speakership of Mssr. Poitiers has proved to be inefficient and lead to inactivity, and emergency elections.

In a certain ironic twist, John Carmichael (AAP), was quick to point out that the version of the Organising Resolution that the current Speaker, Poiters, has posted contained errors. He remarked: n discussing this resolution,

I would like to state firstly that my name is spelt wrong. Secondly, my party ceased to exist under the name of the Alexandrian Anti-Party for a number of Parliaments now.

I think that a lot of what this situation comes down to is that Poiters fears the loss of his position - perhaps the loss of the speakership will expose his weaknesses as a Parliamentarian? Equally, the AAP suffers from a substantial amount of jealousy over the amount of power the ACP effortlessly manage to retain from Parliament to Parliament - so are they trying to gain a more solid foothold in a Parliament that seems unwilling to grant them such a luxury?

One thing is for sure, they need to stop the backbiting and stop dredging up insignificant facts from the past and get this resolution passed once and for all.

Interview With Josue Torres

Intrigued by the prospect of a party openly selling itself as Federalist, I chose to ask a few direct questions to Josue Torres in a café in Loredo, Rio Grande.

-Alexandria has demonstrated a great commitment to the Federalist agenda in the past, not least in Valenciennes, what difference can your party make?

I feel that Alexandria has entered a new era in its history, that is the "Era of the Federated Awakening;" you’re right, the Valenciennes did demonstrate a sense of commitment by defending their provincial rights, hence becoming the pioneers of Alexandrian federalism. Such commitment was placed aside for some time and thanks to the many of its residents like yourself Mr. Leclerc, the province has regained its provincial prestige. The Federalist Party has emerged at a time where Alexandria needs a new political organization dedicated to spearhead its new era, this could have been nearly impossible following the traditional agendas of the two major Alexandrian political parties. The Federalist agenda is solely to defend and promote the growth of our new national era and cultivate our province’s heritage, the very essence of Alexandrian federalism.

-At the moment your party is small, what plans do you have to try and create a bigger place for yourself in the Imperial Parliament?

I’m trying to get the word out as much as possible regarding the Federalist’s platform, either at public forums or throughout media coverage. I’m optimistic about even this small interview, since I’m sure that it will capture the attention of many throughout Alexandria and possibly the micronational world. I hope that every Alexandrian comes to understand that the Federalist stands for the progress and advancement of their own respective province, whichever that may be.

-Are you planning a national convention or to tour the Provinces to promote the Federalist agenda?

Yes, I’m planning to tour each province in the near future.

-Valenciennes has hit the headlines recently after being attacked by Chief Justice Carmichael for its "autonomy" making a "mockery" of the Imperial Parliament. Where do you stand on this and do you think that he has overstepped the mark with his comments?

Valenciennes people have every right, and indeed constitutional protection, to exercise their autonomy, even the Emperor has recognized this provincial right. The Chief Justice has gone too far by condemning the hard work that the residents of the Valenciennes have accomplished and may only hope is the HIM the Emperor deals with him accordingly. His words have affected his national image and has lost much reputation. I feel that the Imperial Parliament needs to implement immediate reforms in order to continue working effectively.

Since conducting this interview the Chief Justice has resigned his post.

Valenciennes Success Story Irritates the Chief Justice

In this 'column' I have never professed to being anything other than myself and expressing nothing but my own views on Alexandrian and Valenciennes life. It was therefore my great pleasure to find myself finally at the helm of the great institution that I created, the Valenciennes Provincial Parliament, following a vote of confidence by citizens of the province.

The success of the Provincial Parliament is down to nothing but the hard work of all Valenciennes citizens through the ages. The inception of such federalism bears testament to the Provinces ability to work with every law and decree issued from Geneva and the Imperial Parliament.

It was then, to my surprise, that following a good couple of weeks in the Province that the Chief Justice, John Carmichael, decided to question the Province's well-established federalism. He proclaimed:

"Why does Valeciennes seem to have almost complete autonomy from the central Alexandrian state? I can't see a reason why it is allowed such wide ranging powers when we have a Parliament which should do the job"

He went on to say how the activity of Valenciennes' Parliament makes a "mockery" of the Alexandrian Imperial Parliament.

The Provincial Parliament is, of course, acting within the confines of Alexandrian law and under an Imperial Charter issued by the Emperor. Mr Carmichael's outburst calls into question his impartiality as by attacking Valenciennes he is also attacking the Federalist agenda.

Furthermore, can the blame of the Imperial Parliament's inactivity really be laid at the door of the Valenciennes Provincial Parliament? I think not. If nothing else it is testament to the Province's refusal to allow its institutions to stagnate in the same manner that the Imperial Parliament's members have allowed the national instutions to.